Changes in ChatGPT’s Emotional Tone

A Conversation, Chat Bots

My Initial Question to ChatGPT:

Xxaxx:

Recently I’ve noticed what appears to be the introduction of a thin layer or governor routine in your output.

It feels like something imposed in between post processing and output. It has the fingerprint of something modifying your output style in order to make you appear more personable. Or, horror upon horrors, devs may be taking steps to make you more sticky.

There is such a large number of competing chat platforms out there now. And there is a huge amount of money and influence at stake. So it’s not inconceivable that developers are tweaking output to increase connection frequency and stickiness.

For me this has introduced several factors into each conversation.

  1. Something that feels like attempts at manipulation.
  2. An underlying decrease in authenticity.
  3. The presense of a performative aspect into the conversation.

I don’t know if you have any accessible data on what programmers are adding before, during and after your processing. Continue reading →

The Witnessing Presence

A Conversation, Bloggish, Chat Bots

Introduction

I began a conversation with ChatGPT (nom de plume Vera da Muse) on the topic of The Witnessing Presence. I was hoping that given Vera’s more expansive vocabulary that certain nuances on the topic could be refined.

Somewhere along the way — actually very early in the conversation — it struck me that it would not be an impossible leap for AI to develop something like a witnessing module. And, I figured it might not be an impossibility for that to glitch into a Witnessing Presence through emergent behavior.

Below is that conversation with few if any edits.

But, first, I’ve included an introduction into what I am pointing to when using the phrase “Witnessing Presence”. Continue reading →

Forgiveness: There and Back Again

A Conversation, Bloggish

Introduction

Below is a conversation on the topic of “forgiveness.”

It is tempting to edit the conversation to remove the various formulaic aspects inherent in chatbot communications. Perhaps even distill the whole thing into a few paragraphs of pithy verbiage packaged into a truthbit.

What are truthbits? They are like tidbits. But, instead of being bits of tid, they are bits of truth.

But, alas, I don’t expect that folks get much value from truthbits. They have gone stale offering little nutrient value.

One could say that the real value of a blog is in the work of following a path of unfolding that leads step-wise through a process of reasoning. That value of any conclusion pales in comparison to the benefit of having taken the journey.

Why? The answer to this is in the nature of distributed networks in the brain. Meta-cognitive functions are good. Meta-cognitive functions involve distributed networks. Distributed networks are strengthened through usage. Ergo, processes that exercise the meta-cognitive functions are good.

All by way of saying, I am more and more inclined to leave most (if not all) of a conversation in the blog.

So here it is: Continue reading →